Field Sobriety Tests and Their Reliability
One of the most common forms of evidence used in Texas DWI cases is the result of field sobriety tests conducted by law enforcement officers. These tests are designed to measure a driver’s balance, coordination, and ability to follow instructions. Typically, they include the walk-and-turn test, the one-leg stand, and the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, which measures eye movement in response to a stimulus. While these tests are widely used, their reliability can often be challenged in court. Field sobriety tests are subjective in nature, meaning they rely heavily on the judgment and interpretation of the officer administering the test. Factors such as weather conditions, uneven surfaces, physical impairments, or even anxiety can affect a person’s ability to perform well on these tests, regardless of whether they are intoxicated. In many cases, the defense will focus on these aspects, arguing that the field sobriety tests were improperly conducted or that the results were inaccurate. The importance of scrutinizing field sobriety tests as part of the defense strategy cannot be overlooked. When these tests are a major piece of the prosecution’s case, their accuracy and fairness can be called into question to help build a strong defense.
PROTECTING YOUR RIGHTS AND FUTURE
Criminal Defense Attorney
Douglas Wilder
Attorney Douglas Wilder has always stayed on the cutting edge of training and attending seminars to ensure he has the most knowledge he can to represent his clients. This has led him to be recognized as one of the Best Lawyers under 40 in Dallas by D magazine, and also recognized as a Super Lawyer for 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022, & 2023. .

