Sex Crimes

What Are the Common Defenses Against Sex Crime Charges in Texas?

Facing sex crime charges in Texas is an incredibly serious matter that can have long-lasting repercussions on an individual’s life, reputation, and freedom. When accused of a sex crime, it is crucial to understand the common defenses available in Texas to protect one’s rights and interests. Sex crime charges encompass a wide range of offenses, including sexual assault, indecency with a child, and possession of child pornography, among others. Each case is unique, and the defense strategy will depend on the specifics of the case, the evidence presented, and the circumstances surrounding the alleged crime.

Challenging the Credibility of the Accuser

One of the most common defenses in sex crime cases involves questioning the credibility of the accuser. This strategy seeks to demonstrate that the accuser may have motives to lie or exaggerate the allegations. It is not uncommon for accusations to arise from personal vendettas, jealousy, custody disputes, or attempts to gain leverage in a related legal matter. In such cases, the defense may present evidence of the accuser’s bias, inconsistencies in their statements, or prior history of making false accusations. By undermining the accuser’s credibility, the defense aims to cast doubt on the veracity of the allegations.

Lack of Evidence

Another effective defense against sex crime charges is to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence presented by the prosecution. In Texas, as in all criminal cases, the burden of proof rests with the prosecution, which must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense may scrutinize the evidence for inconsistencies, procedural errors, or lack of concrete proof linking the defendant to the alleged crime. For instance, in cases of sexual assault, the defense might argue that there is no physical evidence, such as DNA, to corroborate the accuser’s claims. Highlighting gaps or weaknesses in the prosecution’s evidence can significantly impact the outcome of the case.

PROTECTING YOUR RIGHTS AND FUTURE

Criminal Defense Attorney

Douglas Wilder 

PROTECTING YOUR RIGHTS AND FUTURE

Criminal Defense Attorney

Douglas Wilder 

Attorney Douglas Wilder has always stayed on the cutting edge of training and attending seminars to ensure he has the most knowledge he can to represent his clients. This has led him to be recognized as one of the Best Lawyers under 40 in Dallas by D magazine, and also recognized as a Super Lawyer for 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022, & 2023.  .

Attorney Douglas Wilder has always stayed on the cutting edge of training and attending seminars to ensure he has the most knowledge he can to represent his clients. This has led him to be recognized as one of the Best Lawyers under 40 in Dallas by D magazine, and also recognized as a Super Lawyer for 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022, & 2023.  .

PROTECTING YOUR RIGHTS AND FUTURE

Criminal Defense Attorney Douglas Wilder 

Attorney Douglas Wilder has always stayed on the cutting edge of training and attending seminars to ensure he has the most knowledge he can to represent his clients. This has led him to be recognized as one of the Best Lawyers under 40 in Dallas by D magazine, and also recognized as a Super Lawyer for 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022, & 2023.  .

Consent

In many sex crime cases, the issue of consent is a central point of contention. The defense may argue that the sexual encounter in question was consensual and that the accuser’s claims of non-consent are unfounded. This defense is particularly relevant in cases where the parties involved knew each other, such as in date rape or acquaintance rape scenarios. To support a consent defense, the defense might present text messages, emails, or witness testimonies indicating that the accuser willingly participated in the sexual activity. However, it is essential to note that certain factors, such as the accuser being under the age of consent or incapacitated due to drugs or alcohol, can negate a consent defense.

Mistaken Identity

Mistaken identity is another common defense, particularly in cases where the alleged crime occurred in a situation with multiple potential suspects or where the accuser did not have a clear view of the perpetrator. The defense may present evidence showing that the defendant was not present at the scene of the crime or could not have committed the alleged act. Alibi witnesses, surveillance footage, or phone records can be crucial in establishing that the defendant was elsewhere when the crime occurred. Demonstrating that the accuser may have mistakenly identified the defendant can create reasonable doubt and lead to an acquittal.

Quote

The Wilder Law Firm helped me overcome my case with the most favorable outcome possible. My case was dismissed very quickly and they kept me updated throughout the process. They handled all of my court appearances which kept me from having to spend time away from work. I greatly appreciate their help and would highly recommend them.”

- Forrest Davis

Quote

I hired the Wilder Law Firm to help with my Family Violence Citations due to it’s remarkable reviews, experience in the field and high approval rating! The firm successfully resolved my cases and got both of them dismissed. This has not only given me a greater relief, but I’m happy and excited that I have no record to worry about. Thank you everyone at the Wilder Law Firm for the support and patience with me. I’m very excited."

- Steve Ak

Quote

My advice– call Wilder Law Firm– they will help you! I had two cases in two different courts and they were able to get both dismissed! Facing these two charges put me in a really hard time for a few months but with the Wilder Law Firm’s help, I was able to put all this past me and move on with a clean record. This was a hard life lesson but I am thankful for the results."

- Rudy Castanon

False Accusation

False accusations can arise for various reasons, including personal vendettas, mistaken beliefs, or attempts to gain an advantage in unrelated legal matters. The defense may present evidence showing that the accuser has a motive to lie or has previously made false allegations. In some cases, the defense may employ forensic specialists to analyze physical evidence, such as injuries or DNA, to determine if they are consistent with the accuser’s claims or if they suggest an alternative explanation. Uncovering evidence of false accusations can be instrumental in securing a favorable outcome for the defendant.

Violation of Constitutional Rights

Defendants in sex crime cases have constitutional rights that must be upheld throughout the legal process. If law enforcement officers or prosecutors violate these rights, the defense may seek to have evidence excluded or charges dismissed. Common constitutional violations include unlawful searches and seizures, coerced confessions, and denial of the right to counsel. For instance, if law enforcement conducted a search without a valid warrant or probable cause, any evidence obtained during the search may be deemed inadmissible in court. Similarly, if a confession was obtained through coercion or without informing the defendant of their Miranda rights, it may be excluded from evidence. Protecting the defendant’s constitutional rights is a fundamental aspect of a robust defense strategy.

Insufficient Evidence of Intent

In some sex crime cases, the prosecution must prove that the defendant had the requisite intent to commit the alleged offense. The defense may argue that there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the defendant intended to engage in criminal conduct. For example, in cases involving possession of child pornography, the defense might argue that the defendant unknowingly downloaded or received the illegal material and had no intention of possessing it. By challenging the prosecution’s ability to prove intent, the defense can weaken the case against the defendant.

700+ ACQUITTALS, DISMISSALS & REDUCTIONS FOR OUR CLIENTS

Manslaughter

Result: Not Guilty

Assault Family Violence

Result: No Charges Filed

Title IX Accusation

Result: Case Dismissed

Solicitation of a Minor for Sex

Result: Probation

Delivery of a Controlled Substance

Result: Not Guilty

Aggravated Assault with Deadly Weapon

Result: Deferred Probation

Entrapment

Entrapment is a defense that can be used when law enforcement officers induce or coerce an individual into committing a crime they would not have otherwise committed. This defense is particularly relevant in cases involving undercover operations or online sting operations. To establish entrapment, the defense must show that the idea for the crime originated with law enforcement and that the defendant was not predisposed to commit the offense. Evidence of entrapment can include communications between the defendant and undercover officers, demonstrating that the defendant was reluctant to engage in criminal conduct until pressured or persuaded by law enforcement. Successfully proving entrapment can lead to the dismissal of charges.

Mental Incapacity

In some cases, the defense may argue that the defendant lacked the mental capacity to understand the nature of their actions or to form the intent necessary to commit the alleged offense. This defense may be based on evidence of a mental illness, cognitive impairment, or intoxication. For instance, if the defendant was suffering from a severe mental disorder at the time of the alleged crime, the defense may present psychiatric evaluations and testimony to support a claim of insanity or diminished capacity. Similarly, if the defendant was under the influence of drugs or alcohol and unable to comprehend their actions, the defense might argue that they lacked the necessary intent to commit the offense. Demonstrating mental incapacity can lead to a reduced charge or an acquittal.

Statutory Defenses

Certain statutory defenses may apply in specific types of sex crime cases. For instance, in cases involving alleged sexual activity with a minor, the defense might argue that the defendant reasonably believed the accuser was of legal age based on false representations or documentation provided by the accuser. Texas law provides for an affirmative defense in situations where the defendant can prove they made a reasonable mistake regarding the age of the accuser. Additionally, in cases of indecent exposure or public lewdness, the defense might argue that the defendant’s actions were not intended to arouse or gratify sexual desire, which is a required element of the offense. Understanding and applying statutory defenses can be a crucial component of a successful defense strategy.

Fighting for Your Future

If you or a loved one is facing sex crime charges in Texas, it is imperative to seek the assistance of a criminal defense attorney who can navigate the complexities of the legal system and mount a vigorous defense on your behalf. At The Wilder Firm, we are committed to protecting your rights and providing you with the strongest possible defense. Our experienced attorneys understand the nuances of sex crime cases and will work tirelessly to challenge the prosecution’s evidence, advocate for your constitutional rights, and pursue every available defense. Contact The Wilder Firm today to schedule a confidential consultation and take the first step toward safeguarding your future. Your freedom and reputation are our top priorities, and we are here to help you through this challenging time.