Field sobriety tests play a crucial role in Texas DWI (driving while intoxicated) cases. These tests, administered by law enforcement officers during traffic stops, are designed to assess a driver’s physical and cognitive impairment due to alcohol or drugs. Understanding the intricacies of these tests, their administration, and their implications in a legal context is essential for anyone facing DWI charges in Texas. This comprehensive examination will shed light on the significance of field sobriety tests, how they are conducted, and their potential impact on a DWI case.
The Importance of Field Sobriety Tests
Field sobriety tests are standardized procedures used by law enforcement to determine whether a driver is impaired. These tests are critical in establishing probable cause for a DWI arrest. Probable cause is a legal standard that requires law enforcement to have a reasonable belief that a person has committed a crime. In the context of a DWI stop, this means the officer must have reasonable grounds to believe the driver is under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The results of field sobriety tests can provide the necessary evidence to meet this standard.
Field sobriety tests also serve as a tool for law enforcement to gather evidence that can be used in court. If a driver performs poorly on these tests, the results can be introduced as evidence to support the prosecution’s case. Conversely, if a driver performs well, it may be used by the defense to challenge the validity of the arrest and the subsequent charges. Therefore, the outcome of these tests can significantly influence the direction of a DWI case.
Types of Field Sobriety Tests
There are three standardized field sobriety tests that are commonly used by law enforcement officers in Texas. These tests have been validated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and are widely accepted in courts across the country. Each test is designed to assess different aspects of a driver’s physical and cognitive abilities.
The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test is often the first field sobriety test administered during a DWI stop. In this test, the officer instructs the driver to follow a moving object, usually a pen or a small flashlight, with their eyes. The officer is looking for involuntary jerking movements of the eyes, known as nystagmus, which can indicate impairment. The presence and degree of nystagmus are used to estimate the driver’s blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and level of impairment.
PROTECTING YOUR RIGHTS AND FUTURE Attorney Douglas Wilder has always stayed on the cutting edge of training and attending seminars to ensure he has the most knowledge he can to represent his clients. This has led him to be recognized as one of the Best Lawyers under 40 in Dallas by D magazine, and also recognized as a Super Lawyer for 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022, & 2023. .
Criminal Defense Attorney
Douglas Wilder
The Walk-and-Turn (WAT) test assesses a driver’s ability to follow instructions, maintain balance, and perform physical tasks. The driver is instructed to take nine heel-to-toe steps along a straight line, turn around, and take nine steps back. The officer observes the driver’s ability to follow directions, maintain balance, and complete the task without stumbling or losing balance. Performance on this test can provide evidence of physical and cognitive impairment.
The One-Leg Stand (OLS) test requires the driver to stand on one leg while holding the other foot approximately six inches off the ground. The driver must maintain this position while counting aloud until instructed to stop. The officer observes the driver’s ability to balance, follow instructions, and maintain coordination. Indicators of impairment include swaying, using arms for balance, hopping, or putting the foot down prematurely.
Administration of Field Sobriety Tests
The administration of field sobriety tests is governed by strict protocols to ensure accuracy and reliability. Law enforcement officers undergo extensive training to learn how to properly administer these tests and interpret the results. This training includes both classroom instruction and practical exercises to simulate real-world scenarios.
During a DWI stop, the officer will first observe the driver’s behavior and physical condition. This includes noting any signs of impairment such as slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, or the smell of alcohol. If the officer suspects the driver is impaired, they will ask the driver to exit the vehicle and perform the field sobriety tests. It is important for the officer to provide clear and concise instructions for each test and to demonstrate the tasks before asking the driver to perform them.
The officer will closely monitor the driver’s performance, taking note of any indicators of impairment. These indicators are standardized and include specific behaviors or physical signs that suggest the driver is under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The officer will document these observations in a report, which can be used as evidence in court. It is essential for the officer to follow the established protocols to ensure the results are admissible and reliable.
Better call Doug!! Doug is the best lawyer you can find for DWI or DUI cases in Dallas. I read many reviews before choosing Doug for representing my case. Doug handled DWI and DUI cases for last 25 years, He has good relationships with DA office and is Well respected in the community. I have peace of mind with plea bargain today for my case. He also won other case filed on my license suspension. Amy (Paralegal) will help you through out the case. She is very persistent and detailed about the case details. You will never go wrong for chosing Doug. Goodluck. !!” - Anil Lingutla I was charged with a DWI and resisting arrest. Knowing Mr. Wilder previously, I went with the Wilder Law Firm to help me out. Their office was able to get my resisting charge thrown out and reduced my DWI charge for me. This result and lesser sentence allows me a better opportunity to recover from the mistake I made. I appreciate Megan being so kind and patient with me during my process. I would recommend her 10/10." - Isaac Harrell After being arrested for DUI, I contacted Doug Wilder upon recommendation. Mr. Wilder and his entire staff were amazing with their professional handling of my case from start to finish. Every time I rang with questions someone answered the phone, no long waits for a return call. This was important to me considering a DUI is so stressful. Mr. Wilder and his staff not only got my case dismissed but also guided me through the process and offered utmost care. I cannot thank them enough and highly recommend the Wilder Firm." - JJ Canter
Challenges to Field Sobriety Test Results
Despite their widespread use, field sobriety tests are not infallible. There are several factors that can affect the accuracy and reliability of these tests, and defense attorneys often challenge the results in court. One common challenge is the claim that the tests were not administered properly. If the officer failed to follow the standardized procedures or did not provide clear instructions, the results may be deemed invalid.
Another potential issue is the physical or medical condition of the driver. Certain medical conditions, such as neurological disorders or injuries, can affect a person’s balance and coordination, leading to poor performance on the tests. Environmental factors, such as uneven surfaces or poor lighting, can also impact the driver’s ability to perform the tests accurately. In such cases, the defense may argue that the test results are not a reliable indicator of impairment.
Additionally, the subjective nature of the officer’s observations can be a point of contention. Field sobriety tests rely heavily on the officer’s interpretation of the driver’s performance, which can introduce bias or error. The defense may question the officer’s training, experience, and ability to accurately assess impairment. By highlighting these potential issues, the defense can cast doubt on the reliability of the test results and the validity of the arrest.
The Role of Field Sobriety Tests in Court
Field sobriety tests play a significant role in the prosecution and defense of DWI cases in Texas. For the prosecution, the results of these tests can provide compelling evidence of impairment. The officer’s observations and the driver’s performance on the tests can be presented in court to support the charge of driving while intoxicated. This evidence can be crucial in securing a conviction, especially when combined with other evidence such as breathalyzer or blood test results.
700+ ACQUITTALS, DISMISSALS & REDUCTIONS FOR OUR CLIENTS
For the defense, challenging the validity of field sobriety test results can be a key strategy. By questioning the administration of the tests, the driver’s medical condition, or the officer’s observations, the defense can create reasonable doubt about the accuracy of the results. If the defense can successfully argue that the tests were flawed or unreliable, it may weaken the prosecution’s case and increase the chances of a favorable outcome for the defendant.
In some cases, the defense may present alternative explanations for the driver’s performance on the tests. For example, the defense may argue that the driver was nervous or anxious during the traffic stop, which affected their ability to perform the tasks. They may also present evidence of the driver’s normal behavior and physical condition to counter the officer’s observations. By providing a different perspective, the defense can undermine the credibility of the field sobriety test results.
Legal Implications of Field Sobriety Test Refusal
In Texas, drivers have the right to refuse to perform field sobriety tests. However, this refusal can have legal consequences. If a driver refuses to take the tests, the officer may still arrest them based on other signs of impairment, such as erratic driving or the smell of alcohol. Additionally, the refusal can be used as evidence against the driver in court. The prosecution may argue that the refusal indicates consciousness of guilt and that the driver was attempting to avoid providing evidence of impairment.
Refusing to take field sobriety tests can also impact the driver’s driving privileges. Under Texas law, refusal to submit to a field sobriety test can result in an automatic suspension of the driver’s license. This administrative penalty is separate from the criminal charges and can be imposed regardless of the outcome of the DWI case. The length of the suspension can vary depending on the driver’s prior history and the circumstances of the case.
Despite these consequences, there are situations where refusing to take field sobriety tests may be in the driver’s best interest. If the driver believes they would perform poorly on the tests due to fatigue, illness, or other factors unrelated to impairment, refusing the tests may prevent the introduction of potentially damaging evidence. It is important for drivers to understand their rights and the potential consequences before making a decision to refuse the tests
Contact Wilder Firm Today Your Future is Too Important to Leave to Chance
For individuals charged with DWI, the outcome of their case can be significantly influenced by the results of field sobriety tests. A thorough understanding of these tests and their role in the legal process can help defendants and their attorneys develop effective defense strategies. Whether challenging the validity of the tests, presenting alternative explanations, or making informed decisions about test refusal, navigating the complexities of field sobriety tests is a crucial aspect of defending against DWI charges.
If you are facing a DWI charge in Texas, it is imperative to seek legal counsel to guide you through the process. The Wilder Firm has extensive experience in handling DWI cases and can provide the experience and support you need to achieve the best possible outcome. Contact us today to discuss your case and learn more about your legal options.