Driving while intoxicated (DWI) is a serious offense in Texas. When someone is charged with a DWI, the prosecution steps in to present the case against the accused. Understanding the role of the prosecution in these cases is important, especially for those facing charges. In Texas, the prosecution is responsible for proving that the person charged with DWI was driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The prosecutor plays a key role in building the case, gathering evidence, and convincing the court that the person committed the crime. This page will guide you through the prosecution’s responsibilities and strategies in Texas DWI cases. At, Wilder Law Firm, we are here to guide you through the legal process and help you navigate the complexities of your case.
How the Prosecution Begins in a Texas DWI Case
Once someone is arrested for a DWI in Texas, the process begins with the prosecutor filing charges. The prosecutor represents the state and works to show that the person accused of DWI broke the law. At this stage, the prosecutor looks at all the evidence collected by law enforcement. This can include the results of field sobriety tests, breathalyzer results, and witness statements. The prosecutor will review this evidence to decide if there is enough proof to go forward with the case. If they believe the evidence is strong enough, they will officially charge the person with a DWI and begin preparing for trial.
In many cases, the prosecution will offer a plea deal. This is when the prosecutor offers the defendant the option to plead guilty in exchange for a lesser punishment. However, this deal might not always be in the defendant’s best interest. It is important to know that the prosecutor’s goal is to get a conviction, whether by plea deal or through trial. They will use the evidence at their disposal to try and prove the case against the accused.
The Burden of Proof in a Texas DWI Case
One of the most important parts of the prosecution’s role in a Texas DWI case is the burden of proof. The prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was intoxicated while driving. This is a high standard, and it requires strong evidence. The prosecutor will use things like the results from a breathalyzer or blood test to show that the driver’s blood alcohol content (BAC) was over the legal limit of 0.08%. In some cases, even if the driver’s BAC was lower than 0.08%, the prosecution can still argue that the person was impaired and should not have been driving.
The prosecutor may also rely on the testimony of the arresting officer. Officers are trained to recognize signs of intoxication, and their observations can carry a lot of weight in court. If the officer noticed slurred speech, the smell of alcohol, or erratic driving, the prosecutor can use this information to build their case. The goal of the prosecution is to convince the judge or jury that the person was too impaired to drive safely.
PROTECTING YOUR RIGHTS AND FUTURE Attorney Douglas Wilder has always stayed on the cutting edge of training and attending seminars to ensure he has the most knowledge he can to represent his clients. This has led him to be recognized as one of the Best Lawyers under 40 in Dallas by D magazine, and also recognized as a Super Lawyer for 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022, & 2023. .Criminal Defense Attorney
Douglas Wilder
Evidence Used by the Prosecution in DWI Cases
In DWI cases, the prosecution will use several types of evidence to try and prove that the defendant was intoxicated. One of the most common pieces of evidence is the result of a breath or blood test. These tests measure the level of alcohol or drugs in a person’s system at the time of the arrest. If the tests show that the driver’s BAC was above the legal limit, the prosecution will use this to argue that the driver was intoxicated.
The prosecution may also use video footage from the arrest. Many police cars have cameras that record traffic stops. If there is video showing the driver failing a field sobriety test or acting intoxicated, the prosecutor can present this in court. In addition to video, the prosecution may also call witnesses to testify. This could include the officer who made the arrest, as well as any other individuals who may have seen the defendant driving.
All of this evidence is gathered to strengthen the prosecution’s argument that the person charged with DWI was driving under the influence. The prosecution must organize this evidence in a way that clearly shows the defendant was intoxicated and unable to drive safely.
The Role of the Prosecutor in Court
During the trial, the prosecutor plays a central role in presenting the case to the judge or jury. The prosecutor will give an opening statement that outlines the evidence and explains why they believe the defendant is guilty of DWI. After this, the prosecution presents the evidence they have gathered, including test results, police reports, and witness testimony.
One of the prosecutor’s jobs is to cross-examine any witnesses the defense brings forward. This means the prosecutor will ask questions to challenge the credibility of the defense’s witnesses or to poke holes in the defense’s arguments. The prosecutor will also question the arresting officer to make sure their testimony supports the case. The goal is to leave no doubt in the minds of the judge or jury that the person accused of DWI is guilty.
The prosecutor’s closing argument is their final opportunity to convince the court that the defendant is guilty. They will summarize the evidence and explain why it proves that the defendant broke the law. If the prosecutor can persuade the judge or jury that the evidence meets the standard of proof, the defendant may be convicted of DWI.
Potential Outcomes in Texas DWI Cases
The prosecution’s goal is to get a conviction. However, the outcome of a Texas DWI case can vary depending on the strength of the evidence and the defense’s arguments. If the prosecution successfully proves their case, the defendant may be found guilty and face consequences such as fines, jail time, and the suspension of their driver’s license. The exact penalties depend on factors like whether the defendant has prior DWI convictions and the severity of the offense.
In some cases, the defense may be able to get the charges reduced or dismissed. This could happen if the defense shows that the evidence was flawed or that the arresting officer made a mistake. If the prosecution’s evidence is weak or unreliable, the defendant could be acquitted, meaning they are found not guilty.
The prosecutor will fight hard to prove the charges, but the final outcome depends on many factors. Both the prosecution and the defense must present their cases in a way that convinces the court, and this can be a complex process.
700+ ACQUITTALS, DISMISSALS & REDUCTIONS FOR OUR CLIENTS
Why Understanding the Prosecution’s Role Matters
For anyone facing a DWI charge in Texas, it is important to understand the role of the prosecution. The prosecutor is tasked with proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and they will use every tool at their disposal to achieve that goal. Knowing how the prosecution builds their case and what evidence they use can help defendants better prepare their defense.
If you or someone you know is facing a DWI charge, understanding the prosecution’s role can make a difference in the outcome of the case. Working with a legal guide who knows how to challenge the prosecution’s evidence and defend against their arguments is crucial. Being aware of what the prosecution needs to prove and how they will try to do so can help you fight the charges.
If you are facing a DWI charge in Texas, it is vital to have a legal guide by your side who understands how the prosecution works and can help you defend your case. The team at Wilder Law Firm is here to help. They have the experience and knowledge to challenge the prosecution’s case and fight for your rights. Contact Wilder Law Firm today to discuss your case and get the legal help you need.